Elmbridge 3

Amount sought
£157,456
Amount AchiEved
£0 with late review mechanism
Indicative saving
£157,456

The new proposal was for 2 x detached house including a basement - there was previous consent for just 2 x detached houses.

Elmbridge has some of the highest £/m2 values outside of London, which makes viable redevelopment of smaller plots very difficult.

In this instance, sales, build costs, profit and benchmark land value were contested.

On review of the market, it appeared the Council's data was at fault and therefore the resulting valuation skewed. We further obtained a third party valuation to triangulate the two opposing assessments which supported our approach. Build costs and risk environment had also increased since previous reporting.

Finally, the existing 2 unit consent provided a substantial alternative use value to consider in the context of benchmark land value.

It was agreed that no surplus was available, although Elmbridge sought a late review mechanism which was agreed.

More case studies:

Cotswold Barns

Read case study
Amount sought
Amount AchiEved
Indicative saving

Wokingham 2

Read case study
Amount sought
£1.06million
Amount AchiEved
£100,000 + Review Mechanism
Indicative saving
£960,000

Torridge 2

Read case study
Amount sought
£2.1m in S106 Contributions and 60 On-site Affordable Units.
Amount AchiEved
c.£1.2m in S106 Contributions and zero affordable housing units.
Indicative saving
c.£10million.
High Section 106 costs are avoidable

Call us today for a free consultation. Market leader in viability assessment and Section 106 negotiation.

Call us now on
01392 840002
or
Request a call